Stéphane Dion must show integrity and face up to the North American Union agenda

Liberals cannot save the world, if they cannot save Canada

by Peter Tremblay

	Stéphane Dion, Official Opposition Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.

Stéphane Dion, when he was Minister of Environment on November 28, 2005 during the Paul Martin Liberal government, had said, as he welcomed about 10,000 people to a UN conference in Montreal that, "Climate change is the world's most pressing problem of the century" . Mr. Dion has continued to provide apparent leadership in respect of matters regarding Global Warming as leader of the Liberal Opposition in the House of Commons.

However, now that CNN's Lou Dobbs has broadcasted further revelations about a North American Union (NAU) agenda, which is being executed without either review by Parliament in Canada and Congress in the U.S. to date, it is about time that Mr. Dion's Liberals come clean. Mr. Dion's Liberals must now openly bring forth this issue to the Canadian public. The NAU agenda is further detailed in the book entitled 'Traitors among Us: The Betrayers of Canada' . Please also see the CNN video. LINK.

Indeed, how can Mr. Dion present to Canadians that a Liberal government led by him would provide vitally needed leadership on saving the world from catastrophic climate change, when his Liberal opposition cannot provide leadership on saving Canada from take-over by the U.S. Bush administration's religious-political-military-industrial complex? How can Canadians truly trust that the Liberals have turned a new leaf on the Martin government's Sponsorship Scandal, if the current Liberal group does not have the integrity to defend Canada's independence from the U.S. neo-cons. "We desire a full understanding as to why the Canadian people have not been consulted on the Security and Prosperity Agreement (SPP), also known as the tool to create fortress America.", enquiries Catherine Catherine Whelan Costen who is an activist and past President of Canadian Action Party (which is an officially registered Canadian political party).

The Progressive Canadian Party (PC party) led by Tracy Parsons, which is comprised of Tories that broke away from the unconstitutional right wing take over of the Progressive Conservative Party by the Canadian Alliance Party, also opposes the NAU. They see it as being against the Canadian tory vision of an progressive and independent Canada from the U.S. empire.

Ms. Costen further questioned that, "What right do unelected, unaccountable people such as Ms. McLellan and Mr. Manley (former Ministers in the Martin government, who originally signed away Canada to U.S. neo-cons during their government) have to enter into agreements which detrimentally affect the people of this nation; or to attend secret meetings (like the one in Banff last fall), to discuss creating a North American Union to facilitate trade deals, at the expense of the sovereignty of people of three nations?"

Ms. Costen also asked of Mr. Dion, "I am aware that your predecessor Mr. Martin signed the first SPP, and that Mr. Harper signed the second, however that should not preclude you from advising the people of Canada of these acts. After full consultation, I expect you will find that many Canadians are aware and vehemently opposed to the loss of our civil rights, the loss of our sovereignty and the loss of confidence in our elected officials."

"I realize you are a new leader", Ms. Costen also expressed about Mr. Dion, "and that there is a tremendous amount of responsibility on your shoulders; however, if you dare to stand up to these acts, I believe you will find the Canadian people standing with you. I cannot stress the importance of your taking a stand for all Canadians at this critical time in our history. What is the measure of a man, if not his ability to stand for truth, whether it is popular or not?"

Jack Layton NDP's already has shown that his utterances are hypocritical and that his operations comprise that of collaborators reminiscent of Quisling government clique that sold out Norway to the Nazis in World War II. The Bloc Quebecois, as supposed defenders of Quebec's interests, also have not brought forth the dire consequences on Quebec's interests of the NAU, and therefore also betray themselves as collaborators. After all, despite the Bloc's leftist presentations, that party supports elite-driven "Free Trade" and corporate Globalization, which in turn is linked to the NAU agenda.

Will Mr. Dion show his commitment that he is different from the other corrupted political parties in the House of Commons? Will Mr. Dion help lead open parliamentary debate on the NAU? Or has the Parliament of Canada also been surrendered to an anti-democratic corporate agenda?

Advocates of NAU, if their intent is not fascistic, should have the integrity to present their case with open discussions and debate, and that which had occurred in the 1988 Canadian Federal Election, in relation to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The fact that the reported military-industrial elites have not well publicized their desires for a North American Union, shows that their plan is not in the national public interests of Americans, Mexicans, or Canadians.

	Traitors among Us is a book for further reading on this subject.

The use of mantra of "security issues" associated with so-called "War on Terror" as a deceptive 'cover story' to meetings which are actually about a much broader issue of North American Union. Such obfuscation and manipulation is fully consistent with the kind of well-reported lack of integrity and mass-deception which has been associated with 9/11, and the decision to invade Iraq. Indeed, it is apparent that the NAU's link to the goal of a "New World Order" (NWO), betrays a world of orchestrated mass-deception by elites, that seek to disguise an agenda which is against human as well as civil rights.

Indeed, fascism as an oppressive governance system, as represented by the NAU agenda, relies on a system of mass-deception in order to establish itself, and in order to maintain the position of elites who are responsible for its creation. Are the Dion Liberals our prospective saviours, or are they equal conspirators?

The Conservative Party of Canada, and other political parties in Parliament, by not openly discussing such a vital issue, while CNN and other such U.S. media initiate discussions about the North American Union agenda openly, shows that its Parliamentarians do not only lack basic integrity, but are also complicit in what Canadian law defines as treason against Her Majesty and our nation.

Indeed, as many Canadians were celebrating Flag Day this mid-February as a celebration of Canadian nationhood, representatives from the United States, Canada, and Mexico, were involved in talks to destroy Canada, and to transform it into a continental fortress, ruled by military-industrial elites.

Surely members of the House of Commons, as well as the Senate of Canada, have access to CNN, as well as email, faxes, and other representation submitted to them by concerned Canadians.

Former Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau earned the general public perception of being a Great Canadian, because he fought for Canadians in an effort to fulfill our national destiny as a Just Society, having sovereignty from the United States. In particular, despite opposition from corporate elites, Mr. Trudeau fought for the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, against Meech Lake Accord, and for the 'Canadianization' of our economy.

Who will follow in the footsteps of Mr. Trudeau, and champion our national destiny to provide progressive leadership in the world, based upon the necessity of maintaining our national independence from corporate America? Will Mr. Dion provide that leadership, which Mr. Trudeau's son Justin, and others, entrusted him to provide, or will that confidence be for nought?

If Mr. Dion is a true Canadian Liberal, (in the spirit of not only former Prime Minister Trudeau, but of other Canadian Liberal Prime Ministers like Lester B. Pearson, who championed Canada's Flag, and independence in foreign affairs, and Sir Wilfrid Laurier), he must immediately speak up on this issue, that has already been aired in well-established U.S. media.

However, if Mr. Dion is another sell-out, and corrupted politician like former Prime Minister Paul Martin, Jr. -- as was elaborated during the Liberal Sponsorship Scandal -- he will also pretend that talks on the elite-driven NAU are not proceeding in the Stephen Harper government. If Mr. Dion is another sell-out, he will cynically surrender to pressures by the prospective affluent political campaign funders, who seek to destroy Canada, with their fascistic NAU agenda.

Recent polls suggest that Canadians are somewhat shaky on whether they view Mr. Dion as providing a substantive alternative to Mr. Harper, in relation to presenting a vital and national vision of Canada.

Will Mr. Dion earn the trust of Canadians on this vital national sovereignty issue, alongside Mr. Dion's efforts to persuade Canadians that he is not faking sincerity on Global Warming, and 'climate change' in general? Or, will Mr. Dion follow the footsteps of his predecessor Mr. Paul Martin, and further preside, as a political hypocrite, over the destruction of Canada?

Which will it be Mr. Dion?

Make comments about this article in The Canadian Blog.