300 Nationalists needed to save Canada in next federal election from North American Union agenda

by Iain Mackenzie

Are you concerned about the North American Union (NAU) agenda? If not, you should be, unless you want to live under an envisioned anti-democratic continentalist Police State, controlled by a political-military-industrial complex. Rest assured, NAU is not an arrangement intended to be consistent with the human, and other rights of either Americans or Canadians. That's apparently why NAU lobbyists have sought to cover-up this unfolding political arrangement between elites. CNN Lou Dobbs' coverage about the NAU, contrasts with the complete silence about this issue in CBC Newsworld, CTV Newsnet, and other mass-media in Canada.

In the article entitled "Canada's political leaders take positions on the North American Union (NAU) ", LINK, Canadian political parties provided representations on their respective platforms. If you value Canada as your country, along with maintaining your independence as a Canadian, which has access to universal healthcare, and also to other social policy protections, then, the NAU agenda constitutes an ominous threat.

Unfortunately, local and national media, under the common ownership of the very group of "Canadian" elites that has helped lobby for the sell-out of Canada, has sought to limit knowledge about the NAU. The Canadian Action Party (CAP) under Connie Fogal, is the only official federal political party to be clearly against the NAU. The political leadership of the Conservatives, Liberals, the Bloc, and the NDP have all sold out to the NAU agenda, without bothering to have any formal consultations with Canadians. This political cover-up, is in sharp contrast with the open debate associated with the Free Trade Agreement in the late 1980's. At that time, critics led by then federal Liberal Leaders John Turner, and then New Democratic Party (NDP) leader Ed Broadbent, warned that "Free Trade", would lead to the economic and eventual political assimilation of Canada by the United States. Both Mr. Turner and Mr. Broadbent, kept quiet after the Canadian "Free Trade" general election of 1988; but were proved to be right.

Canadians who are against the NAU, could seek to either support CAP or to create a new Common Front political party, that is capable of recruiting 300 candidates in the next Canadian federal election, from sea to sea to sea.

Nationalists across Canada, inspired by a progressive national vision, must seek to galvanize a nationally viable alternative to the apparent traitors of Canada's major political parties. Otherwise, they must look forward to the U.S. military occupying Canada, like hundreds of other countries internationally under such occupation.

You think that it is not possible, eh. Typical Canadian naivety. Think again. When former Prime Minister singed Canada away in the SPP-NAU deal, that he made with U.S. President Bush, the Canadian government gave the authority of the U.S. military to cross the border into Canada, in the name of "fighting terrorism". As a result, Mr. Martin has now given an incentive for those interests that seek the take over of Canada, through instigating some sort of 9/11 catastrophe in Canada. Indeed, the chief ultra-right wing protagonist of the NAU, gleefully remarked to Jerome Corsi and his activist colleagues that NAU is "only a crisis away".

A new generation of at least 300 progressive-minded Canadian Nationalists who are prepared to become candidates in the next federal election, and who can save Canada from destruction under the NAU agenda, is needed. Those candidates would help galvanize critical leadership in defence of the fulfillment of Canada's national destiny as a independent and progressive nation. Such candidates would hopefully re-inspire Canadian convictions to provide vitally needed constructive leadership in the world in areas which include human rights, social justice, peace, and environmental protection toward the affirmation of the quality-of-living, internationally. However the NAU protagonists may take the emergence of that generation as the symptom of the "crisis", that they will need to defend again. This evolution of such a phony crisis, is the course wherein the Stephen Harper government has sought to undermine Canadian sovereignty, in an agenda to assimilate Canada economically, politically, and culturally, into an Orwellian self-destructive course of perpetuated war and oppression.

Make comments about this article in The Canadian Blog.