The Achilles Heel Of Globalism

by Doug Plumb

A myriad of macro societal problems are emerging such as bird flu, genetically modified foods, global warming, harmful vaccines, war on terror, illegal wars mounting, national debts (not in media), war crimes, as well as others to distract us from the nature of the real problem. Members of the public cannot see the forest from the trees and that forest is that the globalists are taking over our respective countries and using confusion to divide dissent. "The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values," said Zbigniew Brzezinski[1] We must examine ways of taking power back in ways that we can work together without dealing with them on their own terms while dealing with all of the issues that concern each of us. We must think outside the box to find ways of taking the power back.

Governance occurs when we visit the doctors office, walk into a building guaranteed to be safe by the society of professional engineers or visit a lawyer while having the suspicion of having our rights violated. The silent and implicit governance that we experience on a nearly daily basis is governance by professionals. Few people realize that professionals do not directly answer to the elected government or to the public in any way. Most professions are self governed and they answer only to their own self governed societies. Governing members of self governing bodies have power is centralized and unaccountable to the public. The stated objective of these societies is to protect the public as stated on the Law Society of Upper Canada web site "The Law Society of Upper Canada exists to govern the legal profession in the public interest by: ensuring that the people of Ontario are served by lawyers who meet high standards of learning, competence and professional conduct; and upholding the independence, integrity and honour of the legal profession for the purpose of advancing the cause of justice and the rule of law."

Recent events suggest that professional self governed bodies no longer act in the interest of the public. I cite some well known examples below to prove this point.

Years ago doctors were required to take the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath is defined in Wikipedia and an important and widely understood part of that oath is (as worded in Wikipedia) "I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone. To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death."[2] This is what we have been conditioned to expect when we visit a doctor -- primarily that we will not be hurt or the doctor will not give an injection that is known to cause harm. Why is it that doctors are no longer required to take this oath? How is it that most of the public is unaware of this important fact? One must conclude that now or in the future your doctor may not be acting in your best interest when diagnosing or treating illness or in the administration of preventative medicine such as in flu shots. Doctors even receive gifts from pharmaceutical companies in return for recommending certain drugs and/or filling numbers of prescriptions [3]. Would this be permitted if doctor professional guidelines were written in the public interest and they were being supervised publicly under a publicly determined set of ethical guidelines ?

On the morning of September 11 2001 we all saw two buildings collapse in a very strange way and later in the afternoon a third (WTC 7) building collapsed in a very conventional way- one that invokes memories of planned controlled demolitions of buildings. Anyone watching the first two buildings collapse would acknowledge that there was something very unusual about how they collapsed. The government explained that the first two buildings "pancaked" - one floor fell on top of the one below causing a progressive collapse [4]. The corporate controlled media has implied that fires and structural damage caused Building 7 to collapse although the investigative bodies contracted by the government have yet to explain this very unusual and unexpected event. Anyone that saw these collapses may be confused about what they saw and open to suggestions explaining the observations.

Five years later more and more people are beginning to question the manner in which the buildings collapsed. Professors of physics and engineering are now saying that things really don't add up and that there must have been additional energy sources (read explosions) in the buildings to permit such an expedient and organized collapse to occur [5][6]. The collapses violated both the first and second laws of thermodynamics as believed by many scientific minds if the official version is to be believed.

The question that keeps bothering me about all of this is how did the government know that the society of professional engineers would keep quiet about this ? The government somehow knew before carrying this out that professional engineers would not be speaking out about the apparent violations of basic scientific laws that the official version of events would imply.

A few days ago I was sitting in a Tim Hortons coffee shop in Toronto sipping coffee with a copy of Dr. John Colemans One World Order Socialist Dictatorship sitting on the table in front of me book marked on the chapter dealing with free trade. I was sharing the table with a chartered accountant. He began the conversation we were about to have by asking me if I believed that we were headed toward a one world order socialist dictatorship. I replied that it has already happened in many ways and is well on the road to completion. I explained that it was happening piece meal and has been in the works over the past hundred years or so since before the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was signed into existence [7]. I explained that one of the primarily vehicles for this to occur was the privately owned banks that create money from thin air and lend it to us with interest [8] and use the profits to buy and control governments to implement their own centrally controlled collectivist/socialist government called the New World Order [9], [10] The chartered accountant became very angry with me and proceeded to explain that governments are the only ones that could create money and that of course he knew this because he was a chartered accountant and had spent half a lifetime working for the government as an auditor. This conversation quickly evolved into an argument with an ever increasing decibel level. It reached a plateau when I asked him what was meant by the term "fractional reserve banking". At this point he began to question himself and he admitted to not fully understanding the term. The New World Order agenda cloaks itself in incredulity rather than in darkness. If chartered accountants were governed by the public they may not only be required to know how money is created but may also be required to educate their clients regarding this before having them sign over money to pay their taxes to these private banks. Citizens would quickly become aware of this scam and elect politicians solely on the basis of their position on monetary reform.

My own personal dealings with the Law Society Of Upper Canada inspired me to give this topic consideration and to write this essay. I do not write about my experiences with the Law Society Of Upper Canada because I would be called crazy and likely only believed by those few others that have had similar experiences. I was in an argument with a lawyer a short while ago and I explained to him what had happened (It is virtually impossible to even report criminal wrong doing by lawyers in Canada even when you have witnesses). I explained to this lawyer that I judged all lawyers based my experiences with the Law Society Of Upper Canada. He responded by explaining that wasn't fair since he does not judge all computer programmers by his experience with only one.

This gentleman had forgotten the implications of self governance and the responsibility that goes along with this publicly granted privilege. I explained that computer programming is not a self regulated profession and my wrong doings can bring me under public scrutiny and I can be held legally responsible for wrong doing in a public court. The public has given lawyers the rights of self governance which means they set the standard for themselves. We as members of the public can only expect that lawyers meet these minimum guidelines. We can learn what the level of expectations of practicing professionals are through direct experience with the self governing bodies when filing a complaint. If a professional under question fails to meet what would normally be considered as ethical conduct and the behaviour goes uninvestigated or unpunished than we can expect the same unethical behaviour from other members that practice under the same system. It would be foolish to expect more or grant more respect than is deserved.

If self governance could be taken away from lawyers they could be restricted from working on secret and some say illegal [12] free trade and public asset sell off agreements between governments and corporations and thus prevent the North American Union from coming into existence.

Self governance of lawyers can be taken away. In Australia it has been wiped out in three states. The government of England wants to strip lawyers of the right to self governance.[13] The terrorist attacks of Sept 11 and the subsequent US government white wash explaining these incidents (NIST report on 9/11 attacks) tells us that the responsibility of professional governance should not be under government control because that can be a double edge sword. It my belief that a public form of professional governance needs to be implemented with the voluntary participation and guidance of retired practicing members of the profession. This may slow down or reverse the moral decay that characterizes society today as well as return power of society to those that earn it through the payment of taxes. Society should not be governed by sets of secret societies. Secret societies exist to take something away from everyone else [14]. Professionals are currently privileged with self governing secret societies and are the house slaves that will keep quiet and implicitly support the Globalists ambitions.

I hope that I have lit a torch that can be carried further along by others that share my beliefs in how much control publicly unaccountable professionals have over society and how they may be working to bring the agenda of the New World Order to fruition. Perhaps things could change if professionals re examined their governance and activities in the context of Globalism. Self governed professionals are in many ways both the fist and the Achilles heel of Globalism and the New World Order.

Make comments about this article in The Canadian Blog.

Endnotes:

[1] Zbigniew Brzezinski, "The Technotronic Era". 1969. (last modified 11:54, 31 January 2007) -often quoted on the web but the book is out of print or unaccessible.

[2] "Hippocratic Oath". Wikipedia, last edited April 16th 2007.

[3] "Study Examines Physicians In Vermont And Minnesota Accepting Gifts From Pharmaceutical Companies", Article Date: 23 Mar 2007 - 8:00 PDT www.MedicalNewToday.com

[4] NIST report (these various official theories are all different and are constantly changing as they are proven to be impossible by members of the patriot movement) see for summary of various theories and their evolution as well as various publications.

[5] 911 Mysteries: Part1 Demolitions, (also available on Google video).

[6] Patriots Question 911 multiple structural engineers, physicists, ex senators, ex FBI heads, ex CIA heads, professors, intelligence experts all question official theory of 911. Structural engineers and others give statements to the very obvious impossibility of the official version of events. Includes links to various 911 truth sites created by professors of science. The best site for 911 truth is often said to be www.911Research.net by Jim Hoffman (excellent summaries here)

[7] Dr. John Coleman., "One World Order Socialist Dictatorship".

[8] Money As Debt, excellent 47 minute cartoon video by Paul Grignon, www.moneyasdebt.net.

[9] G. Edward Griffin, "The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve".

[10] The Money Masters, video, www.themoneymasters.com.

[11] Stephen Zarlenga, "The Lost Science Of Money" (American Monetary Institute).

[12] Treason Abounds ~ Gov't Cabal Plots North American Union (NAU) By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. September 4, 2006, www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com.

[13] Janice Mucalov, "SELF-governance: Walking the tightrope", www.cba.org.

[14] Plato's Republic (interpreted by Francis MacDonald Cornford).