It is apparent that 9/11 and the War on Terror was manifested through the mind of the Demiurge through a Nazi-alien alliance described by Alex Collier. Alex Collier is a self-described contactee of Ethical Extraterrestrials. After the Extraterrestrial War of the 1930’s that was apparently wiped from popular human consciousness, Nazis as the “humanized face of regressive aliens” apparently established cliques of various affiliations which could be used to perpetuate the Demiurge’s parasitic appetite for war.

There is one article link below about the Demiurge. Debate and discuss this article in one of our UFO and Extraterrestrials-related chat rooms below. The following is an article written by Alfred Lambremont Webre which links regressive aliens to 9/11 and the “War on Terror”.

There is empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the events of September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), which involved attacks upon the World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., may in fact have been a hyperdimensional “false flag operation”. The hypothesis that 9/11 may be a hyperdimensional false flag operation is advanced in High Strangeness: Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abduction, a book by France-based author Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The term “hyperdimensional” means “of or pertaining to a system having more dimensions than naturally found in our universe.”

“False flag operations” are defined as “covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.”

The model of 9/11 which a “critical channelling” research source sets out in Knight-Jadczyk’s book holds that the events of September 11, 2001 were in fact a “hyperdimensional false flag operation”, created with converging planning and involvement of a 3rd density “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and 4th density hostile reptilian (hyperdimensional) Extraterrestrials.

The purpose of this series of investigative articles is to examine the evidence supporting this hypothesis about 9/11.

According to the hyperdimensional model, 3rd density refers to the space-time dimension of reality that we humans conventionally inhabit. In the 4th density, time is no longer the regulating dimension it is in our 3rd density, and 4th density beings can travel backward and forwards in time, thus facilitating intervention in 3rd density human public affairs.

As elucidated in a previous Examiner.com article, Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s hypothesis is that a predatory reptilian Extraterrestrial group is targeting our 3rd density human civilization with de-stabilizing events such at the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 in order to ultimately replace our present human civilization with a hybrid reptilian race.

Included in the de-stabilizing targeting operations by predatory reptilian hyperdimensional ETs, is a program of alien abductions sponsored by the 4th density reptilians, and carried out the by 3rd density Gray alien surrogates and black operations of within the military-intelligence world. By one scientific study, up to 6.3 million Americans, or 2% of the U.S. population has been abducted under this hyperdimensional reptilian ET program.

The 9/11 “hyperdimensional false flag operation” model is consistent with empirical evidence gathered at the crime scenes of the 9/11 attacks.

There is compelling evidence that the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were a false flag operation conducted by a corrupt military and elite international war crimes racketeering network (“consortium”) using advanced exotic weapons, for the purpose of launching an international war of aggression (War on Terror) and imposing a domestic police state (martial law) worldwide.

There is also preliminary evidence of a hyperdimensional involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

If the 9/11 hyperdimensional false flag operation is in any degree factual or true, such a conclusion would have far-reaching implications in any deep analysis of the forces shaping important current world public events, such as the 9/11-inspired War on Terror (2001 – present), and 9/11 inspired domestic police state measures such as the PATRIOT Act in the United States and similar martial law legislation elsewhere.

The 9/11 hyperdimensional model, involving the interaction and coordination of a 3rd density powerful human “consortium” and hostile 4th density Extraterrestrials with whom this consortium has working agreements, also would explain why the mysteries of 9/11 have not been successfully explained to date, either by (co-opted) official investigations, or a community of 9/11 researchers, working world-wide since September 11, 2001, to solve the crimes of 9/11 within a conventional 3D science paradigm.

The leaders of the G-20 Nations and most of the other 192 United Member nations and organizations continue publicly to support programs of international wars of aggression and domestic homeland security (police state) measures worldwide by publicly referring to “the terrorist attacks on 9/11” as a pretext.

The evidence in this article serves as a threshold foundation to show that the only “9/11 terrorists” are a consortium of corrupt human military and elites, plausibly acting in concert with hyperdimensional reptilian Extraterrestrials of hostile intent toward humankind. This hostile hyperdimensional 4D reptilian ET intent – in concert with a corrupt human consortium - may be what originally created the false flag operations of 9/11 and continues to be used as a pretext by Earth's 192 national governments and numerous international institutions to create a planet enmeshed in seemingly endless war, crime, disease and poverty.

The issue of establishing operational and legal culpability for the events of September 11, 2001 has deeply divided public opinion in the U.S. and in other societies. One scholarly organization states, “in July of 2006, a Scripps Howard and Ohio University poll concluded that, ‘Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that certain federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them’, and ‘sixteen percent said it's ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings.’"

Polls of United States and Canadian audiences about 9/11 culpability are somewhat divergent. A poll of New York citizens (targets of the 9/11 attacks) shows a relatively high opinion of a conscious conspiracy by “U.S. Leaders”.

“In August of 2004, a Zogby International poll indicated that 49.3% New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens ‘overall’ say US Leaders ‘knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.’ The poll, released on August 30, 2004, also found that 66% called for a new probe.”

Canadian poll audiences, by contrast tend to be more conservative than the New York 9/11 target audience: “In September of 2006, an Ipsos-Reid poll found that 22 percent of Canadians believe ‘the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans.’"

We must turn to the law of criminal culpability around the events of 9/11 – and not to public opinion polls - to find a universal standard around which the concept that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation undertaken by an organized group.

The constitutional standards as to what constitutes treason towards the United States, and what constitutes criminal conspiracy or racketeering can provide the objective standard under the laws of evidence. If prima facie evidence of treasonous action and/or criminal conspiracy planning and executing the events of 9/11 can be established, then established constitutional and criminal law provide the basis or proceeding against the perpetrators of 9/11. Prima facie evidence – evidence of criminal culpability which on its face warrants investigation or criminal charges – is the basis by which constitutional societies achieve an objective standard to determine whether or not a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and caused 9/11 to occur as a false flag operation for specific reasons and outcomes.

The Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act sets out prima facie evidence that a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and carried out the false flag operation on September 11, 2001.

Both the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and the Congressional Memorandum were presented for review and action to senior staff of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2006, shortly after the defeat of the Neo-conservative Republicans in the U.S. mid-term elections on November 7, 2006.

Senior staff of the Judiciary Committee indicated they would be meeting with and presenting the Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act to the incoming chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) during the 2006 Thanksgiving Break in at the congressman’s headquarters in Detroit, MI.

Despite reported statements by senior staff that there was sufficient prima facie evidence in the Congressional Memorandum to proceed with appointment of a public prosecutor to investigate and prosecute apparent treason and war crimes by a “consortium” of corrupt military and elites, no statement was ever issued by the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary committee, and the draft bill (9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act) still awaits his official action.

You can read the entire text of the Congressional Memorandum here.

It sets out the prima facie evidence that a consortium of corrupt human military and elites planned and coordinated false flag operation on September 11, 2001, which constitutes treason under Article III of the U.S. constitution.

The executive summary of the Act and congressional memorandum, as presented to the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. is as follows:

Question: What Is the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?

Answer: The Act is a Public Act of the United States Congress, and a Joint Resolution of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress.

Any U.S. Senator and any U.S. Representative at no cost can introduce it simply by handing the Act to the Clerk according to official rules.

Question: What is the purpose of the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?

Answer: The act would appoint an independent prosecutor under the authority of Article III of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against these United States of America by then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III  of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."

On September 11, 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee released a report by Independent Prosecutor, Kenneth Starr, which eventually led to an Article of Impeachment against President William Jefferson Clinton under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

Question: What are the main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals – then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001?

Answer: This is what the congressional memorandum accompanying The September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act states:

The facts recited above constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, because:

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the FAA and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, then under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion, contradicts the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.

II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition. But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. The controlled demolition, therefore, had to be the work of insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offence. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the president and the secretary of defence (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings implies their involvement in the latter as well.

III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of then Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by then President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behaviour makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.

V. The complicity of then Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the PEOC and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.

VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the then Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”

Question: Where can I find more information about the September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?

Answer: You can find more information at the Internet information website for the 9/11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act at:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/