Attn: Mr. Norman Sabourin
Executive Director and Senior General Counsel
Canadian Judicial Council   K1A 0W8

Open Letter: CJC File: 16-0322

Dear Mr Sabourin,

This Open Letter to be published and distributed widely online is in response to your whitewashed reply dated 5 October 2016.  Justice P. E. Roger and J McNamara are responsible for criminally subverting a Canadian seeking to provide another Canadian having access to the necessities of life.  The result of  Justice P. E. Roger and J McNamara's conspiratorial activities is that now a Canadian is not able to walk, talk or write anymore.  In an apparent effort to perpetuate a Party's bodily assault, abuse, and neglect involving the denial of access to medical services, Justice P. E. Roger's and J McNamara sought to calculatedly ignore all and any evidence that would have ensured that Dezrin Carby-Samuels, that Canadian would still have been able to walk, write or talk.

Justice P. E. Roger and J McNamara not only ignored the inherent jurisdiction of the court to protect life, as recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada but actively proclaimed a personal interest in the judicial proceeding which supported a motive in their illegal dis-abling of the inviolable civil right of a Mother and a son who desires to see each other from being able to see each other.

In response, your Office has sought to ridicule the authority of the Canadian Judicial Council in review matters of judicial misconduct with a farcical response.

It appears that you have not read the Canadian Judicial Council's published declaration entitled Ethical Principles of Judges.

Since that appears to be the case, please let me remind you of the following official declarations and representations of the Council:

Judicial Independence

Judges must, of course, reject improper attempts by litigants, politicians, officials or others to influence their decisions.  They must also take care that communications with such persons that judges may initiate could not raise reasonable concerns about their independence.

Integrity

Judges should make every effort to ensure that their conduct is above reproach in the view of reasonable, fair minded and informed persons

Public confidence in and respect for the judiciary are essential to an effective judicial system and, ultimately, to democracy founded on the rule of law. Many factors, including unfair or uninformed criticism, or simple misunderstanding of the judicial role, can adversely influence public confidence in and respect for the judiciary. Another factor which is capable of undermining public respect and confidence is any conduct of judges, in and out of court, demonstrating a lack of integrity. Judges should, therefore, strive to conduct themselves in a way that will sustain and contribute to public respect and confidence in their integrity, impartiality and good judgment.

The Canadian judiciary has a strong and honourable tradition in this area which serves as a sound foundation for appropriate judicial conduct.

Equality

Judges should carry out their duties with appropriate consideration for all persons (for example, parties, witnesses, court personnel and judicial colleagues) without discrimination.

Conflict of Interest

E.3 - A number of texts and commentaries offer guidance to judges on this subject. The Hon. J.O.Wilson in A Book for Judges, for example, says a judge’s disqualification would be justified by a pecuniary interest in the outcome; a close family, personal or professional relationship with a litigant, counsel or witness; or the judge having expressed views evidencing bias regarding a litigant.

Justice P. E. Roger and J McNamara both miserably failed official standards of conduct published by the Canadian Judicial Council on matters of judicial independence, integrity, equality and areas associated with 'Conflicts of Interest' that your Office is obliged to properly investigate and your apparent attempts to ignore those obligations are both mischievous, subversive and unconstitutional.

Justice P. E. Roger ignored the rules, customs and conventions of the Court in order to pursue what he has openly admitted in Court as a “personal” agenda [in violation of E.3 above] with the support of his accomplice J McNamara as a result of an illicit relationship with John Summers, the Defence Counsel, and the Canadian Judicial Council sees nothing wrong with it?  

You as an agent of the Canadian Judicial Council may see nothing wrong with such activities as corruption, anti-black male racial profiling, bribery and other criminal conduct, but as a responsible Canadian citizen, I beg to differ.

Justice P. E. Roger and J McNamara have in the pursuit of self-aggrandizement and their macabre activities have violated and miserably defiled the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a manner that has threatened life and liberty of Dezrin Carby-Samuels.  In response, the Canadian Judicial Council has shamelessly abdicated its role in our constitutional system.  In so doing, it is apparent that the Council has become apologists for the descent of constitutional system that relies integrity, honour, decency and empathy into the court milieu of many so-called Third World countries, Putin's Russia and Nazi Germany.

It is apparent that your Office is willing to tolerate any form of corruption, ignore any evidence of bribery or other forms of criminal conduct and that your Office also see nothing wrong with self-declared personal vendetta by its Judges.

Such behaviours are well within the purview of the Canadian Judicial Council to investigate and redress so please don't insult our intelligence as Canadians by suggesting that such matters can be the subject of the appeals process.

Canadians have a constitutional right to apply to Court of competent jurisdiction without having to worry about Judges who ignore evidence and court procedure because they have cultivated an illicit relationship with the Opposing Party.

Canadians are entitled to a Court that uses its inherent jurisdiction to protect life as affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada and not a Court that allies itself with the criminal activities of Parties that oppress human rights and subvert the access that Canadians have to the protection of life and access to medical services.

A public petition has been issued calling for the resignation Justice P. E. Roger and his accomplice J McNamara for unethical and criminal conduct will continue to be distributed until your Office holds these Justices accountable for abuses.

Signatories who endorse our public petition are being sent to your Council's email in an effort to make the public aware of judicial transgressions that your Office has yet to redress.  This letter constitutes an appeal of your Office's decision.

Govern your Office accordingly.

Regards,

RCS

Help support petitions against these two Judges here - http://www.thepetitionsite.com/en-gb/takeaction/943/447/186/