The Undeniable Risks of 5G and Other Wireless Radiation to Human Health
DNA strand breaks resulting from wireless radiation can impair cell function, change cell structure and even lead to cell death. It is how humans age, and worse, how cancer develops. This knowledge has been available from as far back as in 1996 when two bioengineering researchers at the University of WashingtonDr. Henry Lai and Narendra Singh at the University of Washington in Seattle conducted a study documenting this breakthrough.
From years back, the electromagnetic radiation utilized by all mobile phone technologies has always led to worry about increased health risks, including developing certain types of cancer. Sadly, there is ample scientific evidence to show that these concerns are valid and that radiation is lethal to human life.
The higher you go up the electromagnetic spectrum, the more dangerous these rays become; clear risks from prolonged exposure have long been established. And recently, scientists have gone well beyond the usual frequencies used by mobile phones, which is the reason behind the public outcry following the rollout of the 5Gtechnology.
5G uses higher frequency waves than earlier mobile networks, allowing more devices to have access to the internet at the same time and at faster speeds and emitting higher energy radiation at unprecedented levels. So whereas, human life was at risk with the use of previous, more basic forms of wireless technology; with 5G networks, those risks are intensified to the most dangerous levels.
Worse still, there are established strict advisory limits for exposure to higher energy radiation levels that can lead to life damage, like medical x-rays and gamma rays. However, there would be no limits to our exposure to 5G and other wireless networks, which means, no limits to the damage it can cause to people who would be involuntarily exposed to the technology.
Response from the Industry
According to a report on 5G crisis.com, after President Bill Clinton signed the 1996 Telecommunications Act into law, scientific evidence of the potential harms of wireless radiation began to emerge. The telecom industry, fearing a public reaction to this evidence, started to lobby for clauses in the Telecommunications Act that would prevent any local interference with the installation of wireless antennas in local communities.
Besides, some scientists and public health who had already established that environmental factors influence our cell biology were still grappling with the idea of how a chronic illness can be caused by non-ionizing RF microwave radiation. However, their refusal to see the dangers does not mean they don’t exist. Just like exposure to cigarette smoke and lead, can cause adverse health effects; increased involuntary exposure to wireless radiation is lethal to human life and many renowned scientists agree.
Dr. Robert O. Becker, surgeon and researcher who was twice nominated for the Nobel Prize, once observed, “I have no doubt in my mind that, at the present time, the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields.”
More than human life, research is revealing that EMR exposure causes harm to all living organisms, including plants, trees, insects, animals and bacteria, even at exposure levels below current U.S. safety guidelines.
A 2013 review of113 published, peer-reviewed studies bya group from the Institute of Environmental Sciences in the Netherlands on the ecological effects of RF-EMF found that in 70% of the studies, wireless radiation had a significant effect on birds, insects, other vertebrates, and multiple organisms and plants.
Other studies on wireless radiation and biological effects
In 2007, researchers at the University of Kentucky proved how exposure to RF microwave radiation can damage and sometimes destroy brain cells.
In 2012, Yale University scientists found that pregnant laboratory mice exposed to RF microwave radiation gave birth to offspring that had poorer memory and were more hyperactive than the control group.
More recently, in 2018, a study by the Ramazzini Institute in Italy, part-funded by the U.S. government, found that lab animals exposed to wireless radiation from distant cell towers were more likely to develop heart tumours than the unexposed group of animals. This was the first large-scale study that proved clear evidence of cancer risk from far-field exposures.
If all these technologies which operate at lower frequency levels that 5G have been known to cause this much harm to life, then one must wonder about the 5G network. According to a U.S. senator, quoted on Scientific American, there is no research on the health effects of the 5G technology, so we are “flying blind.” However, we are not necessarily flying bling considering the overwhelming amount of evidence of harmful effects of 2G and 3G.
Through the years, a growing number of respected scientists have found that the proliferation of wireless devices and computers are causing several significant health impacts. Individuals from all over the world have reportedly experienced all sorts of symptoms ranging from fatigue, headaches, mental confusion and heart palpitations when using wireless devices and when close to cell towers. Wireless radiations are an undeniable risk to our health and can no longer be ignored.
Over 300 scientists and medical doctors have signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate suspension on the deployment of 5G and request that the government fund the research needed to implement biologically-based exposure limits that protect public health and safety, until then, it is best that you remain skeptical about the 5G technology.