Joint agenda against Libya, Iran and Syria

-DR. ABDUL RUFF
___________


I

USA and Europe, the technologically advanced nations now focused on energy resources of Muslim nations in West Asia, having destabilized Afghanistan, Iraq, Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, pretend to be pro-Sunni Arab League and threaten both Iran and Syria of preemptive terror wars for their resources. They consider the weakness of Sunni nations led by Saudi Arabia as being anti-Shi'ite and uses Sunni against Shii'a to advance their energy goals.


Destabilization of sovereign Muslim states through "regime change" by illegal invasions is closely coordinated with military planning in Washington. An extended Middle East Central Asian war has been on the Pentagon's drawing board since the mid-1990s and that could be put into practice only when they managed the Sept-11 terror "show". As part of this extended war scenario, the US-NATO fascist alliance, upon  their immense success in Libya aided by Arab League, now plans to wage a military campaign against Syria under a UN sponsored "humanitarian mandate". Earlier, the CIA-Pentagon secret strategy to destabilize Iran by employing the opposition there had crashed out for better, causing severe strain in the credibility of both CIA and Pentagon as the global leader of subversive politics. In fact western terrocracies stand fully exposed before the entire world as the big criminals, thieves and top bluff-masters. With Iran pressing ahead with nuclear program with Moscow's support, Israel is being pushed into agreeing for a just resolution of Mideast peace

USA is bullying Pakistan to give up its nukes by keeping the drone attacks and  terror climate intact. NATO’s invasion and destabilization in Libya  became easier because Libya had long ago renounced nuclear program. CIA is trying to terror-cash in the fact that Syria, similar to Libya, has no defense against Western systems. With a view to get maximum benefits form the Mideast region, the US and European powers are preparing for an intervention in Syria and they want Turkey to be on their side. NATO terror forces could destroy much of Syria’s air defenses within 48 hours, before starting an “open-ended bombardment of Syrian tanks and ground troops. The joint notorious NATO forces are looking to fashion a regime—with or without Assad—to serve their predatory economic and strategic interests.

Western terrocracies  certify that Kuwait, Qatar, Dubai (UAE) even Saudi Arabia  and Bahrain, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan- all are either the American puppets or under US terror occupation – have got enough democracy and they follow rule of law and therefore there is no need for any “regime change” or preemptive war on them. But, the western rogues see democracy deficit in sovereign Libya as the cause for illegal invasion because  its oil is most superior in quality in the region and “regime change” is must and so they promoted the terrorists to support US oil goals in the country by removing President Col. Qaddafi. Arab league supported  USA as before when they invaded Afghanistan and Iraq.

USA ignited trouble in Mideast with ulterior oil motives but in February, the US-backed Iraqi puppet regime violently suppressed protests inspired by the working class uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. USA did not intervene when Saudi military brutally suppressed the “uprising” in Bahrain. Military intervention in Syria also carries the threat of renewed conflict in Iraq. Syria shares a long border with US-occupied Iraq, including Iraq’s autonomous majority-Kurdish region. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees live in Syria, often in squalid conditions, having escaped the devastation of the US invasion and occupation of their country.

USA created, fueled and promoted local resistance movements in all CIA hit Mideast nations, especially Libya and Syria where the CIA gimmicks got backfired as people rose against NATO imperialism. Libya is a "convenient" revolution for the CIA. After the West received a green light from the Arab League, and after it turned out there is an impressive military force in Libya that can carry out a violent offensive against the regime, the right circumstances through a bogus UNSC permit have led to a Western intervention. USA is not interested in  reforms or democracy but make the puppets to kill the former rulers and associates and ignite insurgence leading to civil war. An extended struggle would them be launched over how to divvy up profits, because Libya, unlike Egypt, is a country rich in natural resources. Obviously, efforts are afoot to see its impact will not only affect Libya, but will also determine the Western and Arab countries’ stances towards similar interventions in Syria or Yemen.

The entire Mideast region is too volatile and fragile. Any NATO/Turkey attack on Syria would antagonize Russia, which maintains close economic and strategic ties to Syria, while straining the resources of NATO members already fighting against Libya. The western terrocracies  do not want to  offer  extra bargain chips to Moscow.  The Western powers could not rely on a local proxy force in Syria to fight on their behalf, as NATO has done with the Transitional National Council in eastern Libya.

Syria has historically supported Teheran's fight against Israeli threat and Iranian legitimate nuclear ambitions and this support could be weakened by a political change in Damascus and hence  both USA and UK are  trying their level best or worst to somehow effect a regime  change. USA employs sanctions as economic  terror tool to cripple the economies of  unfriendly Muslim nations. Focused on increasing its influence in the West Asia region against US manoeuvrings and having got business interests in Syria,  Russia does not want the UNSC-5 to vote sanctions on Syria and it says sanctions against the government of Bashar Al- Assad are not a panacea and will not promote stability in Syria or Mideast. Any possible UNSC decisions on Syria would lead to a repetition of the Libyan scenario complicating an already fragile Mideast terrorized jointly by NATO- and Israel.

US-Israeli terror twins are  upset that Damascus has also supported the Shiite Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, a firm ally of Tehran.
The NATO terror syndicate and Israel, busy killing Muslims, is still harping on the idea of attacking Iran and Syria. The road to Tehran goes through Damascus. A US-NATO sponsored war on Iran would involve, as a first step, a destabilization campaign ("regime change") including covert intelligence operations in support of rebel forces directed against the Syrian government.

II

Although Syria is a Sunni state, Iran has good relations with that nation chiefly because a Shi'ite rules that country and because of this reason Arab League opposes the regime. In order to offset the CIA gimmicks, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called on the Syrian government to accept the reforms demanded by its people. Iran has backed several of the anti-government protests during the Arab Spring, saying the voice of the people "echoes the Islamic reawakening" and should be heard. However, Ahmadinejad cautioned that the Syrian government and people should be careful and implement the necessary reforms by themselves. Ahmadinejad rightly said that Westerners will not bring anyone prosperity and welfare but are just after their own interests and after saving the Zionist regime.Ahmadinejad also has a word of caution for the Syrian demonstrators, saying the Western powers only wanted to protect Israel.

USA-Israel duo has been for years now conspiring against Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine. Israel's July 2006 war on Lebanon also sought to establish Israeli control over the North Eastern Mediterranean coastline including offshore oil and gas reserves in Lebanese and Palestinian territorial waters. The July 2006 bombing of Lebanon was part of a carefully planned "military road map". The extension of "The July War" on Lebanon into Syria had been contemplated by US and Israeli military planners. It was abandoned upon the defeat of Israeli ground forces by Hizbollah.

War preparations to attack Syria and Iran have been in "an advanced state of readiness" for several years. The global dictator US-CIA categorizes Syria along with Iran as a "rogue state" and escalation is an integral part of the military agenda. A war on Syria is viewed by the Pentagon as part of the broader war directed against Iran. There is a clear-cut military road-map characterized by a sequence of US-NATO war theaters. This broader military agenda is intimately related to strategic oil reserves and pipeline routes. It is supported by the Anglo-American oil giants.

Accordingly to reports, CIA agents, who have occupied Mideast for years now thanks to the pro-US puppet regimes, have swifllty moved into Syria as well to their dirty job of destabilization. The Syrian authorities have responded to widespread anti-government protests, meticulously engineered by the CIA, with overwhelming military force. For four months, anti-government protests in Syria, as part of Mideast “uprisings”, have appeared to gain momentum week by week but as the holy month of Ramadan starts, the expectation was that protests would grow. Operations by Syrian security forces also intensified. In a way to restore normalcy, Syrian armed forces appear to have withdrawn from the city of Hama, which has emerged as a center of opposition to Assad’s rule. Protests were held across Syria, including Aleppo and Idlib, near the Turkish border, and the capital, Damascus.

It is not entirely clear if the USA along with Israel is eager to attack Iran and Syria one by one and simultaneously in order to appease the Sunni Arab League for favorable oil prices or USA is targeting these two essentially Shiite nations  on requests from Saudi Arabia led Arab League as part of strong historic links they have forged since World War-1. For Saudi Arabia  and  other Arab nations like UAE, Qatar, Kuwait their promotion of US interests in the region and elsewhere  is more important than creating a strong bond among Muslim nations collectively to protect themselves and  Islam in the face of  serious fascist threat from the enemy of Islam from the  western terrocracies that project their joint  terrorism  to invade Muslim nations and loot their resources  by killing them in thousands and millions.

However, one fact is clear that Islamic is target of all anti-Islamic nations for which Sunni Arabs lend support.  No surprise then that the Syrian government has repeatedly accused foreign-backed extremists of armed criminal gangs of stirring up trouble.

Unable to comprehend the real message of Holy Qur'an and the life of Islamic Prophet,  Muslim leaders still play dirty Sunni-Shi'ite politics and falling prey to the  the waiting anti-Islamic animals. Although the NATO street criminals in democracy uniforms would not  hesitate to attack any energy rich nation, an invasion of Syria could obviously further destabilize Iraq, sending masses of refugees back across the border, and aggravating tensions between the Kurdish regime in northern Iraq and the Shiite Arab-dominated central government in Baghdad. So far, Iraqi puppet premier Nuri Maliki, a Shiite,  has refused to condemn Assad’s actions and has urged Syrian protesters not to “sabotage” the state. Moreover, Maliki, a Shiite, has developed close links with the Iranian government and the Assad regime, both of which have provided him with political support.

III

The agenda against Iran and Syria as well as Libya is not exclusively of the USA-UK terror twins or all western terrocracies but, unfortunately of shameless and brainless Sunni Arab nations as well.

The US-UK terror fanatics are still calling  the shots and are  relevant in spite of  their crimes against humanity. Bush Jr, the  brain behind the Sept-11 terror gimmicks had ensured the support of maximum number of nations, including Muslim world, for the illegal was against Muslim nations for securing oil and routes, by banging fists loud that those nations that do not support and finance the US imperialists are against them.

USA dictates terms to the world and directs the intentional courts on the cases they should concentrate and issues to oil rich countries that do not toe the CIA line warning and threats to affirm that these are  not "democracies". None now  needs US democracy certificates. After Libya and hoping to  weaken Syria, a close ally of Iran, USA has issued a statement that the Syrian president had suffered a “loss of legitimacy,” and that Washington was seeking to gain the support of other countries in condemning the Assad regime. Washington and Israel also vehemently oppose Syria’s ties to Iran and Hezbollah. Though the US and its main Persian Gulf ally, Saudi Arabia, have courted Assad in recent years, the removal of Assad and his replacement with a more pliant tool of US imperialism would fit with Washington’s goal of isolating and ultimately overthrowing the government in Tehran.

The "uprisings" have  destabilized  the nations and weakened all economies of the region and increased unemployment. For instance  Egypt’s unemployment rate reached 11.8% in the second quarter, down from 11.9%in  the first, but higher than last year’s 9%. Libya would be the next because the terror share holders from the west are planning to loot oil form there. When the western leaders and their media  nuts in Mideast promote NATO terrorism and "democracy" in the region, they obviously do not mean to get rid of the Saudi king, whose regime symbolizes the exemplary model of autocratic rule in the Middle East.

The whole idea behind terror wars, uprisings and threat politics is to stay forever in all occupied Muslim nations unless there is strong opposition from populations themselves. While promoting Libyan terrorists to destabilize Libya and loot its vast oil resources, they also cut jokes saying Syrian president Bashar al Assad's position is "untenable". Assad has shrugged off with contempt demands made by The USA and European states pester President Assad to relinquish powers so that their puppets could take position and help the western colonialist invaders.

Existence of NATO as well as veto system in UNSC is indeed a serious enough threat to humanity. Now the faded leaders like Tony Blair a major root cause of Sept-11 and post Sept-11 wars, have not yet recognized the will of the peoples of Muslim nations that are being occupied by NATO rogues but have restated their bogus slogan of defeating radical Islamic terrorism would take "a generation of effort" and also blamed Syria and Iranian intervention for prolonging conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.