Barack Obama's terror doctrine fails America, and the world

Well, should one talk about an Obama doctrine?

Even while remaining a usual American politician of gimmicks, US President Obama's diplomacy has failed both abroad and at home because he is insincere. He has betrayed Americans and Africans, Arabs and non-Arabs, Whites and Blacks. Neither his allies are safe nor are his opponents happy. Both terrocracies Israel and India do not have any obstacles in bribing the US politicians cutting across American party politics. A so-called democracy that permits the presidential candidates to raise sumptuous “funds” from billionaires, multinational corporations and oil-arms-liquor gangsters in anticipation of return favours to the donors is worse than other terrocracies.

Does US president B. Obama have a doctrine of his own that could be tested and verified? Unless he borrows the updated Pentagon-CIA doctrines for promoting US imperialism, Obama does not have any worthwhile doctrine of his own at all. Many analysts admit that if there is something to be known as “Obama doctrine” it is just the continuation of Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war.

The only Doctrine in modern times is the Kremlin military doctrine propounded by Russian leader Vladimir Putin which says Russia could attack any nation even without any credible threat perceptions. This doctrine comes into clash with the prevalent military doctrines existing until then (and after that in Libya) that a country could attack another nation only if there is credible threat perception. But the unilateral USA before attacking any “enemy” always creates the necessary background work for generating threat perceptions to enable the Pentagon and its NATO terror syndicate to invade as it happened in Afghanistan, Libya and other Muslim nations.

However, if one insists on finding one somehow because Obama, maybe for none of his own fault, is the top most leader of the globe, then, phrases like hypocrisy, double-speak, confusion, drone terrorism could easily be attributed to what could be called the Obama doctrine that is basically no so different form that of his predecessor Bush Jr. a continuation of Bush’s doctrine. .

Obama doctrine is full swing in sovereign Libya where NATO terror syndicate has been in an illegal war for months, revealing their collective insanity and jungle barbarianism. Obama doctrine is in live operation in Afghanistan and Pakistan where civilians are being butchered by high precision drones and terror machines.

Terror wars and uprisings have been gainfully employed by the CIA to advance US interests. Had USA and terror allies declared the establishment or forcing of Islamic law in Muslim nations that would have made some sense, after all, Muslim nations just ignore Islam even while bulk of Muslim nations practice certain rituals for the sake of them as a mere formality. Any insistence on the part of USA for Islamic rule in these Arab nations would have produced positive results, because these nations are being controlled by Washington and its European allies and are in fact scared of implementing Islam in true spirits.

But the western terrocracies under NATO terror syndicates are focused on the resources and flesh-blood of Muslim nations and they seek regime change only to put in place puppet regimes, as they have already done in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and now killing Libyans and looting oil only to enact a puppet regime in Tripoli.

Obama was conferred the Nobel peace prize on pure speculation that as a leader of minority in USA he would strive for world peace. But his deliberate mischief was reflected in Obama\'s acceptance speech for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, after he authorized an escalation of the US war in Afghanistan.

About the writer:

Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc);Former university Teacher; Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.

Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices.Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than \"terrorism\".Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims.


There are 0 comments on this post

Leave A Comment